Conference Presentations

search by keyword

The Student Voice: Inter-institutional Research on the impact of QM for Students

As part of QM's research agenda for 2014/2015, we want to encourage intra- and inter-institution research on how QM affects students.  This session will introduce two projects, with some preliminary data, that focus on student perceptions of their online learning experience. The basic research question: How does applying QM to a course affect students?

Project 1) Compare online courses that do, and do not, meet QM standards in terms of affect, self-efficacy, and quality of experience as evidenced in real-time student feedback during the course

The Ultimate Driving Machine: Developing High Caliber Faculty Dispositions for Student Success

Student success is our destination, and faculty dispositions are the vehicle to get us there. Effective teaching practice is shaped by educator dispositions. Faculty coaching can serve as a navigation system to help educators reflect on their dispositions, driving their professional practice.

The Use of Generative AI to Support Inclusivity and Design Deliberation for Online Instruction

This hands-on session explores a conceptual framework for instructional designers to leverage generative AI while addressing ethical considerations. Participants will engage in collaborative activities to analyze AI-generated content, identify potential biases, and apply inclusive design strategies. We will evaluate the ethical considerations and potential risks of generative AI in instructional design. We will also apply an inclusive design framework to mitigate bias and enhance equity in AI-assisted learning experiences.

The Value of Visuals: A Broader View of Standard 8

How does good visual design support the attainment of student learning outcomes? This session is for reviewers and designers who want to take the next step in understanding visual literacy in the online environment. Get a crash course in visuals that will help offer both breadth and depth when providing feedback around Specific Review Standards 4.1, 8.1, 8.4 and 8.5. Presented by Anna Lynch and Renee Petrina of Indiana University's eLearning Design & Services team. 

The WHOLE Experience Framework

The WHOLE Experience framework was used as a guide to facilitate reflective practice as well as examine current DEI practices in (2) online courses. The model allows for practitioners/faculty to reflect and self-assess current strategies and determine how to improve learning engagement, experience, and environments. Student feedback and data were collected via a six-question student evaluation of the courses.

The Yin and Yang of Online Curriculum Design: A Student and Faculty Perspective

This session will explore the interactive dynamics of online curriculum design that reflect the collective experiences and innovation of our faculty and the leadership of our university's technology center. Our goal is to inspire our students to excel in an online environment and to support our faculty in addressing and solving the quality assurance challenges in an online learning environment. The QM process and Rubric are the core of a sustainable online curriculum that focuses on continuous improvement through a highly collaborative faculty, technology, and student-focused system.

The “No Template” LMS Template: Integrated Support for Eight or More Standards for Every Course!

How can we help all faculty meet some of the QM Standards in every LMS course automatically?  How do we keep the content and references up to date when courses are rolled or copied for upcoming semesters?  This session will cover the solution a team of instructional designers and technologists created and what we included to cover all of General Standard 7 plus 4 other standards.

Think Big: Leveraging Inter-institutional Collaboration to Promote Course Quality

The Minnesota Online Quality Initiative coordinates the Quality Matters implementation of a state-wide Quality Matters subscription involving 35 public higher education institutions.  This session will include discussion of challenges, successes and lessons learned. Our approach to implementation is designed to encourage successful, strategic collaboration among faculty from a wide variety of institutions to promote and celebrate quality.  We will discuss practical ideas and processes for building collaboration, communication, and support.  

Tips for Growing and Managing QM Professional Development and Analysis of Student Feedback

You heard you need to scale up your training program “quickly” to prepare all faculty to develop quality online courses. Learn how a large scale system was able to pivot quickly with a collaborative effort across 23-campuses to provide systemwide training. A model will be shared for growing a pool of certified QM facilitators, targeted identification of faculty for specific training, and managing subscriber facilitated QM PD options with a “high touch” model of support for facilitators and participants in the classes.

To "Understand" Measurable Learning Objectives: Helping Faculty Meet Standards 2.1 and 2.2

During this interactive session, we will review case students of actual questions from faculty, discuss actions that were taken and could have been done different to help faculty meet Standards 2.1 and 2.2, and share suggestions and experiences writing or helpful faculty write measurable learning objectives.

To Certify or Not to Certify: Why Should I?

Quality Matters is great, but why bother? 
Let's talk about: (1) why instructors who certified courses went the extra mile,  (2) why instructors who chose not certify didn't go the extra mile, and  (3) how we can use their experiences to help more instructors apply the Quality Matters Rubric to more courses.

The slides in the presentation 

  • present a scenario
  • provide my background
  • agenda
  • learning objectives
  • research overview and findings
  • prompt for audience activity